No edge: fused posterior 64.9% home exactly matches the -185 implied 64.9%, and Market Consensus fair (62.5%) is actually BELOW the retail price — negative EV on both sides.
Edmonton Oilers None
| Source | Spread | Moneyline | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharp Action Best Line | - | -177 / 153 ↑ | - |
| Market Consensus | - | -176 / 155 | - |
| Value Line | - | -186 / 155 | - |
| Sharp Action Best Line | -1.5 (135) | - | - |
| Market Consensus | -1.5 (137) ↓ | - | - |
| Value Line | -1.5 (128) ↓ | - | - |
| Sharp Action Best Line | - | - | Over 7.0 (110) |
| Market Consensus | - | - | Over 7.0 (111) |
| Value Line | - | - | Over 6.5 (-155) |
| De-Vigged Fair Value | 148 / -148 | -166 / 166 | O/U 119 / -119 |
@
DDN SI picks delivered to your inbox every morning.
You're in!
Already subscribed!
These are the saved selections and explanations from the public results record. The analysis below may have been refreshed later.
No edge: fused posterior 64.9% home exactly matches the -185 implied 64.9%, and Market Consensus fair (62.5%) is actually BELOW the retail price — negative EV on both sides.
No edge: posterior says Ducks cover the +1.5 at 58.6% (posterior +0.2pp edge), but -155 demands 60.8% — price exceeds fair value, so it's a pass not a play.
Sharp signal: 6.1% Market Consensus-vs-retail divergence toward under with RLM, and Market Consensus fair 53.7% under vs +125 retail = +20.8% EV — the strongest market in the game.
McDavid leads Edmonton with 39 points; heavy usage in a plus matchup vs a depleted Anaheim forward group, but roster unvalidated so confidence capped at 60.
DDN SI analyzes team matchups, recent form, and statistical trends to generate betting recommendations.
Picks are updated every 30 minutes with the latest data.
Want to reach bettors who use data?
partnerships@degendailynews.com21+ | Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-522-4700