Bruins +1.5 at +130 offers a 2-goal cushion. Minnesota's missing goalie and top D make a multi-goal loss plausible, and +130 is generous for a team with a +6.3% net injury advantage
Minnesota Wild -1.5
| Source | Spread | Moneyline | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharp Action Best Line | - | -210 / 175 ↑ | - |
| Market Consensus | - | -205 / 179 | - |
| Value Line | - | -195 / 160 | - |
| Sharp Action Best Line | -2.5 (200) | - | - |
| Market Consensus | -1.5 (125) ↓ | - | - |
| Market Consensus | - | - | Over 6.0 (-120) |
| De-Vigged Fair Value | 135 / -135 | -193 / 193 | O/U -112 / 112 |
@
AI picks delivered to your inbox every morning.
You're in!
Already subscribed!
These are the saved selections and explanations from the public results record. The analysis below may have been refreshed later.
Bruins +1.5 at +130 offers a 2-goal cushion. Minnesota's missing goalie and top D make a multi-goal loss plausible, and +130 is generous for a team with a +6.3% net injury advantage
Minnesota missing both starting goalie Gustavsson and top defenseman Faber — a -12.6% team quality hit the market has not priced into -192 odds
Model projection only — Foligno is a depth scorer averaging ~0.1 goals/game. No market line available for comparison. Low confidence due to unvalidated roster and small sample.
Our AI analyzes team matchups, recent form, and statistical trends to generate betting recommendations.
Picks are updated every 30 minutes with the latest data.
Want to reach bettors who use data?
partnerships@degendailynews.com21+ | Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-522-4700