scoring model/Dixon-Coles project 5.9 and OMEGA line vs the 6.5 hang, but at -134 the under needs 57.3% and our posterior is only 54.6% — a market-weakest-category lean, never a bet.
Minnesota Wild -1.5
| Player | |
|---|---|
| Source | Spread | Moneyline | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharp Action Best Line | - | 102 / -122 ↑ | - |
| Market Consensus | - | 105 / -116 | - |
| Value Line | - | 540 / -910 | - |
| Sharp Action Best Line | 1.5 (-250) | - | - |
| Market Consensus | 1.5 (-253) ↓ | - | - |
| Value Line | 1.5 (-148) ↓ | - | - |
| Sharp Action Best Line | - | - | Over 6.0 (-120) |
| Market Consensus | - | - | Over 6.0 (-113) |
| Value Line | - | - | Over 4.5 (106) |
| De-Vigged Fair Value | -238 / 238 | 110 / -110 | O/U -106 / 106 |
| Player | |
|---|---|
| Player | |
|---|---|
DDN SI picks delivered to your inbox every morning.
You're in!
Already subscribed!
These are the saved selections and explanations from the public results record. The analysis below may have been refreshed later.
scoring model/Dixon-Coles project 5.9 and OMEGA line vs the 6.5 hang, but at -134 the under needs 57.3% and our posterior is only 54.6% — a market-weakest-category lean, never a bet.
Market Consensus fair value rates the home -1.5 cover at 71.3% vs the market's 70.3%, and the away +1.5 at +220 sits right at the equity line — the only NHL spread cell (CONFIRMED, 2.0% edge floor) slightly above fair.
Team leader with 14 goals; Wild missing center depth (both Folignos IR) should concentrate usage. Unvalidated roster caps confidence below 60 per prop lines block.
DDN SI analyzes team matchups, recent form, and statistical trends to generate betting recommendations.
Picks are updated every 30 minutes with the latest data.
Want to reach bettors who use data?
partnerships@degendailynews.com21+ | Gambling Problem? Call 1-800-522-4700